Blog

  • Organisations As Living Spaces

    Currently there is no automatic mechanism within the market to protect and build the commons, nor any institution that exists to do so. The commons can be understood as the foundational human, social and natural value that supports life and determines the degree to which communities and individuals can be free to flourish- free to live.

    Our collective challenge is to create an economic system that supports life in a way similar to the self-replenishing systems of our planet – hence the central importance of the commons.

    Capitalism is a systemic design. Any intervention that genuinely can be classed as systemic must, in some way, address its core mechanisms – ownership, capital, and profit – which too often combine together to extract value and consolidate wealth and power on behalf of fewer and fewer people (with all the adverse social and environmental effects that accompany such a systemic extractive design). In contrast,

    A Commons Equity Society structure uses each of these mechanisms in a different way – one that reverses their direction in a generative way and institutionalises virtuous values, cycles, sinks and flows, in an overarching legal structure to create value and commons wealth for more and more people, beyond the state but within the market.
    It offers a whole system redesign as a single discrete entity within the existing economic system, which then continues to grow, expanding gradually to eventually create a commons zone within the market. In doing so it contrasts not only stewardship with (private) ownership, but state (public) ownership with the commons as fertile versus infertile ‘ground’.

    Taking the analogy further we distinguish between organisations as living and dead spaces. Just as a tuning fork contains the potentiality for a particular sound to emerge, a Commons Equiy Society is a three dimensional socio- economic organisational structure that is a ‘living space’ – that allows life to self-create, self-replenish and self-programme – that enables beingness to emerge and be well.

    To our knowledge, the new narrative does not as yet have words to describe this design property beyond ‘facilitative relationality that allows potentiality to emerge’. This property probably applies to people as well as organisations and to time as well as space. When we meet someone with those relational characteristics or skills or when we experience something over time with those properties we feel seen, nourished and inspired to be.

    Our individual challenge then – our responsibility – is to use our freedom to be our best – ‘best for the world rather than best in the world’ (i) – in other words in a way that is consistent with the relational arrangements that allow for the flourishing of the whole that enabled us to flourish in the first place.

    (i) Richard Barrett

  • What is systemic change?

    Ethical solutions and social enterprise are a necessary but insufficient basis for systemic economic change.

    Words like ‘systemic,’ are not easily comprehended from within our mechanistic culture. (more…)

  • How A Commons Society Builds A Resilient Town

    A local Commons Equity Society creates a domestic economy in which everyone involved is personally invested – whatever their role. Sharing surplus profit in the right way creates transformative virtuous circles of motivation, investment and capability through a whole new level of civil society funding.

    Imagine a town called Wellbeing where…

    community wellbeing thrives. Its a place of quiet abundance because most  community organisations and services have the funding that they need because companies that are part of the towns Commons Equity Society – a network of employee owned companies –  routinely invest in the things that matter to people such as: schools; doctor’s surgeries; complementary health practices; community services; community buildings; high street shops and local enterprises both small and large, social and for-profit; local infrastructure; energy; land, farming and food. They do so not out of sense of any individual or board decision but but because of the legal structure of which they are a part that automatically distributes surpluses to create non-monetary human and environmental value.

    Businesses that are a part of a Commons Equity Society become heroes of their community – no more need for loyalty schemes!

    Imagine a circle of land around each town bought for community agriculture. Imagine land and property bought and held in perpetuity by the community so that land costs are taken out of the cost of housing and our children can afford homes once again.

    Local voluntary, cultural  and environmental organisations can benefit every year from internal investment, from this community utility thereby creating inter-generational financial and cultural stability, flexibility and responsiveness to the evolving needs of the community and natural world.

    Why wouldn’t you want to support companies that contribute to your community in this way?

    A Commons Equity Society frees communities previously dependent upon government, philanthropy or corporate social responsibility. Supporting each other and protecting our environment is the natural consequence plus a revival of local democracy ensues because communities will have their own finance independent of government.

     

  • Building the Wellbeing Economy Through A New Economic Model

    THE PROBLEM WE ARE ADDRESSING

    An economic system that has been described as “unstable, unsustainable, unfair and unhappy” (i)

    OUR PROJECT

    The Commons Equity Society is a new model of company ownership, finance and distribution that addresses each of the above dysfunctions. It is a re-imagination of the mutual ownership tradition of Great Britain.

    We are working to establish the first Commons Equity Society – a new form of provident society if you will – that is not driven by the savings of individuals but by the on-going surpluses of for-profit mature companies. It involves a network of for-profit companies held by a charitable organisation. The organisation uses the profits from the companies to build, manage and protect the shared wealth and wellbeing of the community it serves.

    Our assertion is that we cannot have a wellbeing economy – that is more resilient, sustainable and fair – without a systemic change in the relationship between companies, finance institutions, charities and communities. ‘A Commons Society” achieves this by harnessing the power of enterprise and channeling the surpluses that profitable companies create towards what we collectively most value. (ii)

    OUR ANALYSIS

    To transform the economy so that it works for the common-good, we need to solve the power paradox. The power paradox resides in the fact that it is only through people’s personal agency, initiative and power that anything happens. And yet power also corrupts. This has also been referred to in “The Tragedy of the Commons”. (iii)

    We are not convinced that any new regulatory framework, regulatory body, law, government policy, or even economic theory of itself will be able to find the balance place between the two polarities of power. Neither do we believe that ethical good intentions are alone sufficient.

    The regulatory devices that society currently depends upon to protect us from the excesses of the market – in other words from the over-concentration of power, which results in the benefits of the system being disproportionately shared amongst the few – are often limited in scope and always open to being subverted.

    OUR PROPOSAL

    We are developing a systemic solution to the problem that will find its own in-built and naturally occurring balance point without additional external regulation. It requires no changes in the current rules governing the economic system.

    Through a simple adjustment in corporate structure, applied through already-existing and well-understood legal mechanisms, it is possible to rearrange the relationship between finance institutions, businesses, co-workers, charities/NGO’s and communities to generate a systemic shift in our economy.

    BENEFITS & FURTHER CONSEQUENCES

    System-wide transformation – The Commons Equity Society will bring an economic transformation in which employee ownership expands, wealth is more widely shared, communities are enriched and entrepreneurship can become a force for wellbeing and social good.

    Entrepreneurship recognised for its core societal value -This approach liberates executives of currently listed companies from the tyranny of short-termism (the reality of the current shareholder value model), and that whilst those hoping to make a fortune from parasitic gambling on stocks and shares might lament, the genuinely creative will still be able to make their fortunes and prove their worth through their work.

    A legacy solution for exiting entrepreneurs – Such a structure also offers a safe haven, which is not subject to the risks of secondary speculative markets, for the creative fruits that retiring company owners have built up over a lifetime. Their company can be sold or gifted to the Commons offering retiring owners both a fair reward and a viable future for their organisations and their employees that additionally contributes further to the wellbeing of the communities they belong to.

    Replicable and Scalable – Because the structure encompasses automatic mechanisms for stability (through the logic of the employee owned organisation) and expansion (by bringing more and more companies into the Commons Society each year) our long-term vision is of a series of such societies in every region of the UK (like Building Societies), of the EU and beyond. We foresee the establishment of an alternative, parallel system within the free market that distributes and shares surplus in a completely different way to companies driven by the logic of shareholder value. Fortuitously, it offers a structure that pensions funds will still be able to invest in but by means of bonds rather than equities.

    The Commons Society makes it possible for communities to take the economy back into their own hands. Re-investment of the profit and prudent governance will ensure the new Commons Societies will continue to grow.

    i) The New Economics Foundation

    ii) The Commons” can be considered as the human, social and natural “capital” that contributes to the common wealth and foundational, shared value that supports the wellbeing of all. David Bollier, an expert on the Commons, suggests that “The commons can be considered as all those things in nature and civil society which we are duty bound to protect and build upon for future generations.”

    (iii) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy_of_the_commons

  • What is the most outrageous thought that you could have today?

    • What if every year your community won the lottery and there was a big new pot of money to spend on people, buildings, land and nature – in fact on anything that would improve life for you and your community?

    • Imagine every year, everyone had a vote to decide on what this money should be spent on.

    • Imagine your family, friends and neighbours working together to make the best use of this new annual community fund and ensuring it was spent wisely.

    • It could mean new jobs.

    • It could mean new community facilities, affordable housing and farms.

    • It could mean new educational, arts or health projects.

    • What would you spend this annual windfall on to create wellbeing in your community?

    • And what if, instead of the lottery, this just happened as a matter of course because there was a new, simple practical way that allowed companies to share all their profits with communities and still trade profitably?

    • And what if this was also better for the companies because people (their customers) wanted them to succeed because it was in everyone’s interest, and they could focus on long-term success instead of paying short term dividends to a few investors.

    • And what if this new productive economic system could be grown in community after community and gradually redistribute power and wealth across society without the involvement or permission of politicians, government, banks or corporations? Would that be worth the price of a beer?

    • What if together we could grow this new economic model in parallel to the existing system so that within less than a generation a national network of these could become as big as the City of London. Would that be worth – the price of a ticket for the football or a subscription to the gym or golf club perhap?

    • What if, as this new economic network grew and replicated its new institutions – like regional community banks for instance controlled by local communities – together began to buy utility companies, farms, supermarkets, rail and transport companies and eventually big corporations like Barclays and Amazon turning them into engines for community wellbeing and opportunities for all. What would that be worth?

    • Gosh this is a thought that is getting really big!

    In fact perhaps the most outrageous thought you could have today is that not only is this possible but that you could help to make it happen

      • In the past when governments and institutions failed to provide for peoples needs grass roots mutual aid organisations stepped in. Building Societies for example were formed in the 19th century so that individuals could buy homes as personal assets. Today through this new structure, Commons Societies can enable us to own companies together and thereby share, protect and develop our common wealth.

      • In this way we can ensure that business is still valued but that it serves society by sharing its success so communities can invest in the things that communities need now and for the future.

      • This new system of ownership, finance and distribution will re-balance society by enabling Civil Society organisations to provide a counterweight to the current monopoly that governments and big corporations have on power and resources.

      • In so doing we will move past a point in history where the economic landscape and political debate is determined only by separatist interests and the maximising of profit and power for the few.

    “Whatever you can do, or dream you can do, begin it. Boldness has genius, power, and magic in it. Begin it now.”

  • 10 Reasons to Leave Your Company to Your Workers When You Retire

    It’s a once-in-a-generation opportunity: Selling to employees can yield a better price, preserve a legacy, keep jobs and profits local—and maybe even eradicate inequality. Thus is one way that a Commons Equity Society can grow.

    This article is part of New Economy Week, a collaboration between YES! Magazine and the New Economy Coalition that brings you the ideas and people helping build an inclusive economy—in their own words.


    Billionaire entrepreneur Nick Hanauer wants to warn the world’s elite that “the pitchforks are coming.” He has spoken and written at length in an effort to make his wealthy comrades understand that today’s obscene inequality is not only unfair, it’s bad for business. Thomas Piketty’s best-selling book, Capital in the Twenty-First Century, gave a great analysis on why the rich keep getting richer (because they own productive capital) and advocated for a global wealth tax. If the pitchforks do come, we can be pretty sure that won’t lead to better outcomes. But the chances of implementing Piketty’s proposed solution to inequality are essentially zero.

    One strategy that does stand a realistic chance of lessening inequality is a large-scale effort to support business owners selling to their employees and forming worker cooperatives and democratic ESOPs (Employee Stock Ownership Plans). This is a once-in-a-generation opportunity. The baby boomer retirement wave, dubbed the “Silver Tsunami,” means that over the coming decade, millions of business owners, controlling trillions of dollars of business wealth, will be trying to figure out how to retire and sustain the businesses they’ve built and the jobs they’ve created.

    Supporting conversions to worker ownership provides a substantial win for everyone. For business owners, selling to employees can yield a better sale price, reduce their tax liability from the sale and preserve their legacy. Employees gain the opportunity to become cooperative entrepreneurs and build wealth through ownership. The community retains jobs, profits and owners committed to staying locally rooted. So there you have it: a ton of reasons to sell your business to your workers. Or at least ten!

    1. Your kids don’t want it, and no one person in your town wants it.

    When Vern Seile, one of the largest employers on Deer Isle, Maine, decided it was time to retire and sell his three retail businesses, he realized he had no one to sell to. His kids didn’t want the whole enterprise, and there was nobody on the remote island who could buy it, either. If he sold it to someone from “away,” they wouldn’t care for it like he had and preserve the legacy he’d built over several decades. In fact, the only offer came from a competitor on the mainland who promised to close one of the businesses and lay people off (see Reason #2, below).

    Seile discovered that if he wanted to be rewarded fairly for years of hard work, his best option was to sell to his employees. In June of 2014, the Island Employee Cooperative (IEC) was born. This was the largest and most complex conversion to a worker cooperative ever done in the United States, and the IEC has become the largest worker co-op in Maine and the second-largest in New England.

    2. Your competitors would love to steal your customer list and downsize—or even shut down—your operations.

    Realistically, given Reason #1 above, what will probably happen to your business if it doesn’t simply shut down is that a competitor will buy you out, plunder your customer list, and cut jobs. In 2005, that’s what was facing the owners of Select Machine, a company based in Kent, Ohio, that manufactures, sells, and distributes machined products and equipment. “These are our guys, our family, and we wanted them to keep on working,” company co-founder Bill Sagaser said of his former employees in a 2006 interview with Bloomberg BusinessWeek.

    Sagaser and his co-founder, Doug Beavers, engineered a better solution: With the help of the Ohio Employee Ownership Center, they sold the company to the workers, and enjoyed tax-deferral on the proceeds (see Reason #5!). The company faced hard times in the Great Recession, but managed to weather the downturn and grow back (see Reason #4!).

    3. Your employees already know a lot about running the business.

    Some people think letting employees have a say in running the business is like letting the inmates run the asylum. But think about it: The best businesses already engage worker intelligence and creativity, through open book management, “Theory Y” management, or even Zappo’s “holocracy.” Why not tap into not just their intelligence, but also their self-interest? Employees are going to put more effort into hitting sales targets, solving problems, and contributing to decisions if they get to see the reward as the success of their own enterprise.

    And your employees don’t need MBAs to get the hang of it, either. Take, for example, A Yard and a Half Landscaping Company, in Waltham, Massachusetts. Founded in 1988 by Eileen Michaels, the company was already succeeding by opening its books, sharing profits with employees, and involving employees in decision-making. When Michaels decided to prepare for retirement by offering the company to her employees, incorporating as a worker-owned cooperative was a natural step. The bilingual co-op employs many workers from El Salvador, and classes on everything from horticulture to democratic decision-making are offered in English and Spanish.

    4. Your employees really, really want this business to stay in business.

    The only thing harder to find than a job in many rural, inner-city, and immigrant communities is a good job. And even harder to find is any opportunity to own a business and build wealth. Imagine the difference it makes to the construction workers who are now equal owners of Build With Prospect, Inc. in Brooklyn, New York City. They vote for and can hold a seat on the board, thereby determining the overall direction of the company. They influence decisions on everything from human resources to the long-term plan. If they cared about keeping their jobs before, think how much more it means now, when they share in the long-term profits. That’s going to show up in the quality of their work. And the quality of their jobs is going to show up in the quality of their lives.

    5. There are government incentives to sweeten the deal (but there should be more).

    Vernon Seile, Bill Sagaser, Doug Beavers, and countless others have benefited from various federal and state subsidies and tax breaks when they sold their businesses to their employees.

    At the federal level, USDA-Rural Development is the primary source of funding and technical expertise for developing co-ops, but that support is limited to rural areas. Many states are living up to their reputation as “laboratories of democracy.” In states as diverse as Iowa, New Jersey, Ohio, and Indiana, Republicans and Democrats have worked together to invest in employee buyouts, provide tax benefits to business owners who sell to their employees, and create Employee Ownership Centers, all to meet the unique challenges and opportunities of employee ownership conversion. And cities are starting to catch on, with NYC leading the way and investing about $4 million in the past 2 years in worker co-op development, and Madison, Wisconsin, pledging $5 million over 5 years.

    But the resources spent by all levels of government on supporting employee buy-outs don’t amount to a rounding error, especially when compared with the taxpayer dollars that go down the tube on race-to-the-bottom tax cuts and corporate welfare. It’s time to invest in more effective strategies .

    6. A lot of businesses have made the switch and thrived.

    Thousands of business owners have read The Companies We Keep by John Abrams, founder of the South Mountain Company on Martha’s Vineyard, and wondered if they, too, could create small businesses that honor community and place. When Abrams started the design-build firm forty years ago, he didn’t imagine that his company would become the poster-child for successful employee ownership. And they’ve done it not through wild growth since becoming a worker co-op in 1987, but through thoughtful development. They are widely respected for integrating handsome design with energy efficiency, combining attention to detail with creative vision and excellent customer service. They have been profitable every year since becoming worker-owned, and, as Abrams writes, “nobody’s getting rich, but we are living comfortably doing the work we enjoy in the location of our choice. All of us are able to make good livelihoods because no one of us is getting rich.”

    One company hoping to follow in the footsteps of South Mountain and carve a new path is Namasté Solar, founded in 2005 and a worker cooperative since 2011. They employ more than 60 people now, and in order to obtain better pricing on panels and financing launched a purchasing cooperative, Amicus Solar, to bring together other independent solar installers—including South Mountain Company, which is now a member-owner.

    7. There are professionals who know how to help a business owner get it done.

    The Democracy at Work Institute is leading a nation-wide collaborative, Workers to Owners, that brings together advisors, accountants, lawyers, and lenders who can work with business owners and their employees to create worker ownership solutions. The group includes technical assistance providers such as the Cooperative Development Institute, the ICA Group, the Ohio Employee Ownership Center, Project Equity, the University of Wisconsin Center for Cooperatives, the Vermont Employee Ownership Center, and the Working World; and lenders such as Capital Impact Partners, the Cooperative Fund of New England, National Cooperative Bank, the Northcountry Cooperative Development Fund, the LEAF Fund, and Transform Finance.

    And if you’re interested in Employee Stock Ownership Plans, you’re in luck—the National Center for Employee Ownership has just made its Service Provider directory public.

    This group can do a lot. But let’s face it—unless people who work in businesses, own businesses, or advise business owners (such as bankers, financial managers, brokers, and accountants) get on board to help raise the profile of this common sense approach, we’ll be swimming against the tide. So it’s up to all of us to spread the word and learn more.

    8. Employee owners are better, more engaged citizens.

    Chris Mackin identifies one of the key outcomes of employee ownership as the making of good citizens: “healthy non-intimidated human beings.” As David Erdal writes in Beyond the Corporation: Humanity Working, the communities of employee-owned businesses benefit not only from the flow of wealth into the local economy, but also because the skills of participation learned at work can be deployed in community activities

    President George Washington gave tax incentives to rebuild the fleets of New England cod fishers after the Revolutionary War—on the condition that the captains and crew sign contracts ensuring broad-based profit-sharing among workers. He and many of the founding fathers insisted that an ownership stake for a broad base of the citizenry would guard against European-style feudalism (or popular revolt—see Reason #9, below!). Researchers Joseph Blasi and Richard Freeman recount the fascinating history of support for broad-based ownership that stretches from the nation’s founding to the present-day in The Citizen’s Share.

    9. Broad-based ownership is the surest, fairest way to keep the pitchforks from coming.

    Think about what John Abrams said about South Mountain: “None of us is getting rich, but we’re all living comfortably.” What would a society like that look like? I bet it wouldn’t look like it’s about to break out in pitchforks.

    If we can transform ownership of the economy, people will be able to control their own jobs, and we’ll slow down the rate of concentration of power in the hands of the wealthy. This was a concern for the founding fathers (see Reason #8, above), and then as now broad-based ownership was the preferred solution.

    There are the beginnings of such a movement but it needs to gain much wider acceptance and receive a ton more support.

    10. Worker ownership looks good from every political angle.

    Politicians and activists from across the political spectrum are strong supporters of employee ownership, so a strong, effective political coalition can be built to move this forward. Champions have included representatives from Ronald Reagan to Bernie Sanders, because employee ownership works. It strengthens economic and community development by enabling more people to build wealth through the ownership of private businesses.

  • Imagine

    • Imagine if you were part of a community that had almost unlimited resources to invest in community assets, people and nature

    • Imagine new kinds of businesses and ‘banks’ being the heroes of society because of the real wealth and wellbeing they create for everyone!

    • Imagine businesses being so much part of the community that customers would do everything they could to make them successful because they felt supported by enterprise rather than exploited by it!

    This is one way of envisioning a wellbeing economy and It is possible to start building it right now

    • within the existing market

    • outside the control of politicians and

    • without need of support from banks or shareholders

    It is based upon a completely new kind of mutual legal structure called a Commons Trust Corporation that funnels the surplus from mature enterprises into a Commons Trust governed by and for its members and other stakeholders in the network.

    A Commons Trust Corporation is a mutual umbrella structure in which specially established charities own a network of mature companies and distribute 100% of company profits. The innovation is in the way they do this which allows the companies to continue being successful and creates a stable, sustainable and transparent system of production and distribution that is both just and legitimate.

    It does so by:

    • growing the network of companies owned

    • rewarding the people who have created the surplus ( managers & employers)

    • operating a form of organisational democracy that allows people to have a say on where surplus is invested and

    • investing capital every year in the things that communities want

    Such as:

    • mutually owned land that is held in perpetuity by communities so that housing can be more affordable

    • community farms in every community that are mutually owned in perpetuity so people can be involved with growing and producing food and have direct access to nature and quality food

    • schools that have greater independence from government and council control to support their pupils in he ways they see fit

    • local health centres of different kinds that are an addition to the NHS which can’t continue growing as it is

    • arts and sports programmes and facilities that are community owned and sponsored

    • customized apprenticeships and training for young people

    • environmental and biodiversity initiatives

    • social enterprises and new start businesses

    • in fact whatever community members decide is a priority

    What would you like to see supported in your community?

  • Distributing power – the underlying conceptual insight for the Commons Corporation

    The hypothesis driving our project is that if power is truly shared then the natural capacity of people to collaborate can be relied on to ensure success.
    Power attracts fear and desire – ultimate accountability rests with the top boss in any system. National politicians must claim to be powerful, must accept accountability, otherwise they aren’t attractive. Yet the power they then wield is corrupting and distorting because it is so wide. Similarly, the Boards of large organisations have power beyond their capacity to provide meaningful accountability (just look at Volkswagen!).
    Yet a risk must be taken if power is to be truly shared for accountability and ultimate arbitration must remain local with no higher recourse, apart from if laws are broken, however as well as risk there is potential for reward, and that reward is a real opportunity for human beings to flourish in meaningful smaller scale communities.
    We have, in the UK, a legal framework established with good intent. That is a good start. Then, the Commons Corporation has its own constitution and regulations that orientate the system towards a collaborative approach.
    Therefore, in the Commons Corporation, almost all power is irrevocably delegated to the managers of the organisations with only “structural” powers being retained to protect the cohesion of the system.
    Like in a living eco-system, the Commons Corporation naturally grows but is self-regulating because real financial and political power is positively deployed in each self-determining component. That power cannot concentrate in an unhealthy way.

  • Article Published about the Elysia Commons in Italy

    Aurelio Riccioli of Istituto per la Tripartizioni, an Italian blog that represents the idea of managing the social commonwealth along the 3-fold lines of culture, economy and justice, came across the Elysia Commmons while carrying out his research. He has worked his way through our literature and come to meet us and now he has published an article about us on his blog:

    www.tripartizione.it/articoli/elysia_commons_02_2015.html

    We will translate this into English as soon as possible, but post it now for those lucky enough to be able to speak Italian!